Abadzi, H, & Martelli, M (2014). Efficient reading for Arab students. Word summit of innovation for education, Qatar.
Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading comprehension in different proficiency levels. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 101-122.
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal , 78 (4), 465-483
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 576-598.
Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009). Increasing elementary-aged students‟ reading fluency with small-group interventions: A comparison of repeated reading, listening teacher modeling, and listening only strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 211-228.
Birjandi, P., Estaji, M., & Deyhim, T. (2013). The impact of dynamic assessment on reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Iranian high school learners. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 3(2), 61-77.
Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baker, S. K., Doabler, C., & Apichatabutra, C. (2009). Repeated reading intervention for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 263-281.
Fahmy, M.M (2013). The effect of dynamic assessment on adult learners of Arabic: A mixed-method study at the defense language institute foreign language center. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of San Francisco.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
Harding, L. Alderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T., (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3) 317– 336.
Haywood, H.C. & Lidz, C.S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hosp, M., & Fuchs, L. (2005). Using CBM as an indicator of decoding, word reading, and comprehension: Do the relations change with grade? School Psychology Review, 34(1), 9-27.
Ibrahim, r., Khateb, A., & Taha, H (2013). How does type of orthography affect reading in Arabic. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics. 3, 40-46.
Isavi, E. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian L2 writing performance. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530902
Jarrahzade, Z & Tabatabaei, O. (2014). Promoting EFL learners' reading comprehension skills through dynamic assessment using Guthke's lerntest approach. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3, 32-39.
Jenkins, J. R., & Johnson, E. (2011). Universal screening for reading problems: Why and how should we do this. Response to Intervention Network.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49-72.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Navarro, J & Lara, L. (2017). Dynamic assessment of reading difficulties: predictive and incremental validity on attitude toward reading and the use of dialogue participation strategies in classroom activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(173), 1-14.
Pelli, D., Tilman, K., Freeman, J., Berger, T., & Majaj, N (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vis, 20(1). 20-36.
Pikulski, J. J. & Chard, D. J. (2002). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519.
Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French. The Pennsylvania State University, United States: Pennsylvania.
Poehner, M.E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: a Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2010). Vygotsky's teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 312-330.
Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2014). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing.32(3), 337-357.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 119-129.
Scott, T. M., & Shearer-Lingo, A. (2002). The effects of reading fluency instruction on the academic and behavioral success of middle school students in a self-contained EBD classroom. Preventing School Failure, 46(4), 167-173.
Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 137-170.
Thouësny, S. (2010).Assessing second language learners’ written texts: An interventionist and interactionist approach to dynamic assessment. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA), Toronto, Canada.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wehby, J. H., Falk, K. B., Barton-Arwood, S., Lane, K. L., & Cooley, C. (2003). The impact of comprehensive reading instruction on the academic and social behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 225-238.